2—Cold Mountain Cold Rivers Complaint

Exhibit 1, Jan. 5, 2001 NOI. In that NOI, Plaintiffs also reminded the Defendants of the helicopter

hazing prohibition in the “Horse Butte Area.” See Ex.1. The NOI additionally notified the

Defendants that the Annual Operation Plan for the 2000-2001 Montana Department of Livestock

(MDOL) Bison Capture Facility violates the Biological Evaluation (BE) and BO, and therefore the

ESA, by redefining the boundaries of the Horse Butte Area where Helicopter use is strictly

prohibited. Sixty days has now lapsed since Plaintiffs sent the NOI. See Ex. 1.

2.

Plaintiffs hereby also challenge the Annual Operation Plan and Special Use Permit

issued by the Gallatin National Forest, and the use of helicopters in the Horse Butte Area to haze

bison. On April 27, 2000, Plaintiffs originally sent Defendants a sixty-day NOI for various ESA

violations, including helicopter hazing in the Horse Butte Area. See Exhibit 2, April 27, 2000 NOI.

By the non-discretionary terms and conditions of the BO, and the Incidental Take Statement (ITS)

contained therein, helicopter hazing in the Horse Butte Area is strictly prohibited to protect nesting

bald eagles and their habitat.

3.

In May of 2000, prior to expiration of April 27, 2000 NOI, Plaintiffs sought

equitable relief in the form of a motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to halt the

continuing illegal hazing of bison in the Horse Butte Area over bald eagle nests and their foraging

territory. At the hearing on the petition for the TRO, the “Defendants represent[ed] to the Court that

there is no intention for future helicopter hazing in the Horse Butte Area.” See Exhibit 3, Judge

Lovell’sMay 15, 2000 Order, p. 4; see also Ex. 3, Order, p. 2.

4.

Plaintiffs further allege that the effects of hazing bison with helicopters on

threatened, endangered and sensitive species was never appropriately analyzed in any

Environmental Assessment (EA), Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Biological Assessment

or Biological Opinion, and therefore constitutes violations of the National Environmental Policy

Act (NEPA) and the Endangered Species Act.

5.

Finally, Plaintiffs allege that helicopter hazing resulted in the disturbance and

displacement of trumpeter swans and other migratory birds from their habitat on the Madison Arm

of Hebgen Lake. Trumpeter swans are protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Such actions